Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Polyviou and Markides join the team


Well known lawyer and constitutional expert Polis Polyviou has been appointed as an advisor on the Greek Cypriot side’s negotiating team, Phileleftheros reports.
He will take part in today’s meeting between negotiators Andreas Mavroyiannis and Kudret Ozersay and will be sitting in on the talks.
In addition former Attorney General Aleckos Markides will from now on also become involved and will speak directly with President Anastasiades and the legal team.
The paper says that according to sources, this has been deemed necessary as talks go deeper into details.
Today’s meeting is expected to deal with procedural issues that were raised at the first meeting.
2. Rights of Turkish settlers will be protected
Turkish Cypriot prime minister, Ozkan Yorgancioglu, has promised Turkish settlers that they will do whatever they can in order for them to be given citizenship in a future federal Cyprus, Turkish Cypriot daily Afrika reports.
The paper writes that the Turkish settlers are feeling uncertain as to what will become of them, as no one has explained to them in the event of a solution.
We are all included in the definition ‘Turkish Cypriot people’. Everybody who lives in the country and is a citizen, not an old or new citizen, and sees his future here is included in this. Our target should be an agreement in which our interests will be protected,” Yorgancioglu told a delegation from the association of the Turkish war veterans. “It is our duty to protect the rights of the people who have lived here for 40-45 years, who were born here,
3. A portrait of Turkish Cypriot negotiator Kudret Ozersay
Kudret Ozersay is not your typical technocrat/negotiator, says Sotos Ktoris in an online portrait of the man appointed as Turkish Cypriot negotiator.
He also has political ambitions and is one of the most important figures in the new generation of Turkish Cypriot politicians, an obvious choice for the position of negotiator. The forty-year old academic is considered a moderate political figure, is widely respected internationally, and above all, is “mainstream” in his opinions on the Cyprus problem. His doctoral thesis at the University of Ankara focused on the legal validity of the 1960 agreement. He has also authored a series of academic texts on various aspects of the Cyprus issue, such as the property issue, bizonality, security, and guarantees. His standing as an academic and technocrat, as well as his political acumen, have made him an excellent connoisseur, and adroit handler of the legal, political and historical dimensions of the Cyprus issue.
His positions on the Cyprus problem reflect the overall consensus of opinion of the vast majority of Turkish Cypriots, which can be summarised as wanting to change the divisive status quo in such a way so as to safeguard and secure the ethnicity of the Turkish Cypriots within a loose, bizonal, bi-communal federation. Ensuring the 'maximum' bizonality has, for Ozersay, been the cornerstone of Turkish Cypriot aspirations, as the only thing that can guarantee the security of the Turkish Cypriots against the prospect of being overrun by the Greek Cypriots with their greater numbers and financial clout. The Turkish Cypriot insistence on a 'strong' bizonality is rooted precisely in this belief, and the painful experience of the 1963-1974 period.
He believes that the experiences of the two communities in the recent past is at the heart of their different interpretations with the fundamental principle of bizonality on the one hand and respect for human rights on the other. He believes these two principles are what further exacerbate a settlement of the property issue which with the passage of time has turned into a "huge technical and legal conundrum”.
Ozersay is critical of the stand of certain Turkish Cypriot political forces in favour of 'clean' bi-zonality, as well as their view that the Third Vienna Agreement definitively resolved the property issue. At the same time, he considers the Greek Cypriot claim for unrestricted recovery of the property they owned before 1974 as a distinct threat to the Turkish Cypriot community.
Ozersay derives his political strength directly from the Turkish Foreign Ministry, which views him as their most reliable interlocutor in Cyprus. Together with Ozdil Nami at the Turkish Cypriot foreign ministry, who maintains excellent relations with Ahmet Davutoglu and his party, they form a new cadre within the Turkish Cypriot community which is directly accountable to Turkey, further limiting the influence Dervis Eroglu has in the negotiating process. Appointing Ozersay as negotiator reflects the Turkish government’s intention to " finish" the Cyprus problem, either through a negotiated settlement, or by upgrading the "TRNC ". By replacing the inflexible nationalist Osman Ertug, allows Ankara to manage the negotiations with greater flexibly and without the threat of internal reactions, in order to either reach a solution or put the blame for a deadlock on the Greek Cypriot side.
As the academic Niazi Kizilyurek says, this time the Cyprus plane will land either at the airport of the solution or that of partition. The coming negotiations with Ozersay will be difficult, particularly on issues considered vital for the Turkish Cypriots (bizonality, guarantees). However, it is encouraging that the talks will be conducted with someone who, despite his own father having been killed by Greek Cypriots in 1974 in the village of Alaminos and whose remains were identified in 2007, nevertheless never attached himself to the partitionist and nationalist rhetoric of the Turkish Cypriot right. 

No comments: